Uni-President-IR

Board of Directors’ Performance Evaluation Implementation Status

The Company's regulations governing the board performance evaluation were approved by the 18th session of 6th board meeting on Nov 6, 2019. The Company's board of directors shall conduct an internal board performance evaluation every year. Internal and external board performance evaluations shall be completed before the end of the first quarter of the following year. The board performance evaluation report was submitted to the Remuneration Committee on 2026/3/3 and the board of directors on 2026/3/5.

Evaluation Cycles

Evaluation Period

Evaluation Scope

Evaluation Method

Evaluation Aspects

The Company conducts the board performance evaluation once a year.

From January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025

The scope includes the individual directors and the Board of Directors as a whole.

Methods include self-assessments by each board member and internal assessment of the Board.

A.The individual directors are assessed on the following six aspects:

Understanding of the Company’s goals and mission (15%)
Awareness of director’s duties (10%)
Involvement in the Company’s operations (35%)
Internal relationship and communication (10%)
Director’s professionalism and continuing knowledge development (15%)
Internal controls (15%)

Conclusion:
Each director provides professional advice and insights based on their respective expertise, making effective contributions during Board meetings.

B. The Board of Directors are assessed on the following five aspects:

Involvement in the Company’s operation (30%)
Enhancement of the quality of the board’s decision-making (30%)
Makeup and structure of the board (15%)
Election of board members and continuing knowledge development (10%)
Internal controls (15%)

Conclusion:
The Company’s Board of Directors operates effectively, and its members possess sufficient understanding of the Company, the management team, and the industries in which the Company operates, thereby upholding the principles of corporate governance.

The Company conducts the board performance evaluation once a year.

From January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025

The scope includes the Remuneration Committee and the Audit Committee.

Methods include the Remuneration Committee and the Audit Committee.

C. The Remuneration Committee is assessed on the following five aspects:

Involvement in the Company’s operation (20%)
Awareness of the audit committee’s duties (30%)
Enhancement of the quality of the audit committee’s decision-making(35%)
Makeup of the audit committee and election of its members (15%)

Conclusion:
The Committee is provided with complete meeting materials, and all agenda items are thoroughly discussed. Going forward, the Company will continue to conduct performance evaluations of directors and managerial officers and review its compensation policies as a reference for Board decision-making.

D. The Audit Committee is assessed on the following five aspects:

Involvement in the Company’s operation (20%)
Awareness of the audit committee’s duties (20%)
Enhancement of the quality of the audit committee’s decision-making(30%)
Makeup of the audit committee and election of its members (15%)
Internal controls (15%)

Conclusion:
Management prepares detailed and comprehensive information, and the Committee exercises rigorous oversight to ensure financial transparency and sound governance effectiveness.

Evaluation Cycles	Evaluation Period	Evaluation Scope	Evaluation Method	Evaluation Aspects
The Company conducts the board performance evaluation once a year.	From January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025	The scope includes the individual directors and the Board of Directors as a whole.	Methods include self-assessments by each board member and internal assessment of the Board.	A.The individual directors are assessed on the following six aspects: Understanding of the Company’s goals and mission (15%) Awareness of director’s duties (10%) Involvement in the Company’s operations (35%) Internal relationship and communication (10%) Director’s professionalism and continuing knowledge development (15%) Internal controls (15%) Conclusion: Each director provides professional advice and insights based on their respective expertise, making effective contributions during Board meetings. B. The Board of Directors are assessed on the following five aspects: Involvement in the Company’s operation (30%) Enhancement of the quality of the board’s decision-making (30%) Makeup and structure of the board (15%) Election of board members and continuing knowledge development (10%) Internal controls (15%) Conclusion: The Company’s Board of Directors operates effectively, and its members possess sufficient understanding of the Company, the management team, and the industries in which the Company operates, thereby upholding the principles of corporate governance.
The Company conducts the board performance evaluation once a year.	From January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025	The scope includes the Remuneration Committee and the Audit Committee.	Methods include the Remuneration Committee and the Audit Committee.	C. The Remuneration Committee is assessed on the following five aspects: Involvement in the Company’s operation (20%) Awareness of the audit committee’s duties (30%) Enhancement of the quality of the audit committee’s decision-making(35%) Makeup of the audit committee and election of its members (15%) Conclusion: The Committee is provided with complete meeting materials, and all agenda items are thoroughly discussed. Going forward, the Company will continue to conduct performance evaluations of directors and managerial officers and review its compensation policies as a reference for Board decision-making. D. The Audit Committee is assessed on the following five aspects: Involvement in the Company’s operation (20%) Awareness of the audit committee’s duties (20%) Enhancement of the quality of the audit committee’s decision-making(30%) Makeup of the audit committee and election of its members (15%) Internal controls (15%) Conclusion: Management prepares detailed and comprehensive information, and the Committee exercises rigorous oversight to ensure financial transparency and sound governance effectiveness.